Implications Of Firm Organizational Cost â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Implications Of Firm Organizational Cost? Answer: Introduction The corporate social responsibility (CSR) is considered as the initiative of the company to asses as well as takes the responsibility of organizational impact on the social and environmental well-being (Lawrence Weber, 2014). The companies have wide variety of reasons to engage in the CSR activities. This is considered as a commitment to improve the general infrastructure of the community. The important concepts of corporate social performance, stakeholder management, business ethics, sustainability and business ethics are all inter-related with the CSR activities of the firm. The CSR activities of a firm have positive impact on the customer perceptive of the company and the intent of them to purchase the companys products or avail their services (Agarwal Singh, 2016). There is also a positive impact of the CSR activities on the job-seeking intent as the potential candidates would be more likely to work for a socially responsible firm. These kinds of activities are responsible for greater brand reputation and greater goodwill in the market. The CSR activities do not always increase the revenue of the company. There has been a growing debate about the financial viability of CSR initiatives. This essay would discuss the various aspects of the CSR initiatives including the advantages and disadvantages concerning it. The various management concepts concerning the topic would be discussed in an elaborate manner. Discussion As opined by Harrison and Wicks (2013), the corporate social responsibility (CSR) is concerned with the self-regulation of the organizations which is integrated into the business model. These policies have an active compliance with various aspects of ethical standards and international legislations. Experts are striving to establish the positive relationship between the outcomes of CSR activities and the degree of certainty that it would bring positive outcomes for the company (Agarwal Singh, 2016). The return on investment on the CSR activities needs to be justified. It is important to understand the return to the stakeholders for understanding the contribution of CSR to the organizational effectiveness. The stakeholder theory focuses on the idea of long term sustainability of the multinational corporations which are dependent on various constituents (Hrisch, Freeman Schaltegger, 2014). The stakeholders are considered as the important parts of the business entities as they help the organization to fulfill its mission (Agarwal Singh, 2016). The stakeholders include the customers, employees, investors, governments, communities and others. These entities are said to form positive associations with the company and help the company to engage in lucrative opportunities (Kim, Kim King, 2016). The stakeholders often view the CSR activities of the company by witnessing their level of success and their ability to impact the beneficiaries. According to Bojanic (2015), the means-end theory focuses on the fact that the purchase decisions made by the consumers are directly related to the product/service attributes and benefits obtained from them. The first benefit is related with the functional aspects in which the tangible as well as intangible characteristics are measured (Hrisch, Freeman Schaltegger, 2014). The second benefit is concerned with psychosocial aspects in which the sociological and psychological well-being of the customers are being measured (Hrisch, Freeman Schaltegger, 2014). The third factor is concerned with the values of the customers that decide the level of importance to them. This theory emphasizes on the fact that the consumers try to maximize these three benefits by making purchase decisions (Kumar et al., 2014). The CSR activities are also assumed to have high degree of benefits to the customers (Hrisch, Freeman Schaltegger, 2014). The customers have either direct involvement with the customer s or they get involved in the process by gaining mere knowledge. There are various benefits of the CSR process, which have been grouped based on various approaches. CSR is a viable tool for gaining competitive advantage as the good works of the company would be appreciated by the public and they would purchase the products or services of the particular company (Sethi, Martell Demir, 2017). The CSR activities also help in the development of the corporate image and corporate legitimacy (Hrisch, Freeman Schaltegger, 2014). The company which engages itself in the matters of the society and engages in the community betterment are perceived better by the audiences. There is significant value creation through the process of CSR activities. There is an enhanced value creation for the organization, which would help the company to secure good manpower. It is obvious that more qualified candidates would be joining the organizations if it has a reputation of good CSR activities. As commented by Bajic and Yurtoglu (2016), the CSR activities are often estimated by the profitability statements received from the financial statements. There are issues with the actual measurement of the CSR performance (Sethi, Martell Demir, 2017). There have consensus issues on the operation aspect of CSR activities. There are also measurement challenges regarding CSR activities and there are no set standard procedures (Sethi, Martell Demir, 2017). It has been argued that the CSR is an expensive task as the social activities incurs additional responses for the company (Tsai et al., 2015). The social actions do force the companies to make considerable investments in environmental affairs such as pollution control, deforestation, community sponsorships and donations to NGO or community bodies (Sethi, Martell Demir, 2017). There are number of other expenses that are undertaken by the companies for keeping the CSR activities function smoothly. This often has an adverse impact on t he profitability of the firm and there is stagnant financial performance. As defined by Chun et al. (2013), the corporate citizenship of a firm is concerned with the involvement of the social responsibility of a business entity which can meet ethical, legal and economic responsibilities of the firm (Tsai et al., 2015). The aim of the corporate citizenship is to ensure that there are higher living standards and high quality of life among the communities (Tsai et al., 2015). It is important to maintain the good socially responsible organizations in which there is encouragement of the investors and employees so that they can help in the growth and prosperity of the organizations. There are several benefits of the corporate social responsibility on the financial profitability of the firm. However, research shows that a positive but weak correlation of the corporate citizenship and the financial performance of the firm (Christensen, Mackey Whetten, 2014). The high spending on the CSR activities of the firm often hampers the financial profitability of the firm. There is a significant reduction in the return to the stakeholders, which leads to the increased prices to the customers (Chen Lin, 2014). When the customers perceive that they are being charged extra for the same products or services, then they would consider their purchase decisions. There are instances when they switch brands and they may move to some other companies (Christensen, Mackey Whetten, 2014). This would reduce the sales of the companies as there would less purchase, which may have severe impact on the profit generation of the firm. There can also be lowering of the wages of the employees as the firm may not be able to provide full compensation to all employees (Christensen, Mackey Whetten, 2014). In an attempt to do cost cutting, the organization may witness more attrition rate. There can be lot of employees who would be willing to change the company and join a close rival (Christensen, Mackey Whetten, 2014). This may have significant impact on the financial performance of the firm. According to Situ, Tilt and Seet (2015), the corporate environmental reporting is concerned with the level of environmental burden. This is because of the fact that the companies do not disclose the perfect picture of how their decisions are affecting the environment. The legitimacy plays a vital role in the choices of the firms regarding the environmental disclosure (Christensen, Mackey Whetten, 2014). There should be environmental performance metrics which would analyze the contribution of the company towards the environmental matters such as waste reduction, greenhouse gas reduction and water consumption. It is important for the firms to be responsible and yet be profitable in terms of their financial performance. The firms have an objective of increasing the strategic profits and are sustainable in the long run. The stakeholders of the firm value the social efforts of the firm and should gain positive benefits when they are associated with the firm. It is important to generate more profits by the act of more product differentiation, which would help the company to satisfy the needs of more number of target audiences (Chun et al., 2013). This would also ensure that the audiences would make number of purchases from the company and hence it would be able to generate more profits. The firm should also be able to attract more number of competent staffs so that they would be able to serve the customers in a better way. The customers would return to the company if they get good services and good behavior from the staffs. Conclusion The modern day organizations face the challenge of being competitive and staying ahead of the rivals. At the same time, they do need to formulate some tricks so that they do not suffer financial losses. It is important for the companies to formulate important strategies so that they can continue with their CSR activities as well as gain sufficient financial profits. It is important that the firms should not suffer losses and engage in CSR activities. This essay showcased the important benefits of CSR activities and how it is beneficial for the company. It is also important to gain profits and this essay focused on the different aspects that tend to lower the financial profits of the firm. It has been argued that the CSR is an expensive task as the social activities incurs additional responses for the company as there are certain cost parameters that are related to it. However, the companies should aim for increasing the profits and at the same time, engaging in a variety of community activities. References Agarwal, S., Singh, R. (2016). 21 Corporate social responsibility practices in the Indian food industry.A Stakeholder Approach to Managing Food: Local, National, and Global Issues,4, 297. Bajic, S., Yurtoglu, B. B. (2016). CSR, Market Value, and Profitability: International Evidence. Bojanic, D. C. (2015). An Examination of the Means-End Model of Price, Quality and Value in the Service Industry. InProceedings of the 1996 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference(pp. 163-163). Springer, Cham. Chen, M. L., Lin, C. P. (2014). Modelling perceived corporate citizenship and psychological contracts: A mediating mechanism of perceived job efficacy.European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,23(2), 231-247. Christensen, L. J., Mackey, A., Whetten, D. (2014). Taking responsibility for corporate social responsibility: The role of leaders in creating, implementing, sustaining, or avoiding socially responsible firm behaviors.The Academy of Management Perspectives,28(2), 164-178. Chun, J. S., Shin, Y., Choi, J. N., Kim, M. S. (2013). How does corporate ethics contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of collective organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior.Journal of Management,39(4), 853-877. Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance.Business ethics quarterly,23(1), 97-124. Hrisch, J., Freeman, R. E., Schaltegger, S. (2014). Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework.Organization Environment,27(4), 328-346. Kim, B., Kim, S. S., King, B. (2016). The sacred and the profane: Identifying pilgrim traveler value orientations using means-end theory.Tourism Management,56, 142-155. Kumar, D. T., Palaniappan, M., Kannan, D., Shankar, K. M. (2014). Analyzing the CSR issues behind the supplier selection process using ISM approach.Resources, Conservation and Recycling,92, 268-278. Lawrence, A. T., Weber, J. (2014).Business and society: Stakeholders, ethics, public policy. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. Sethi, S. P., Martell, T. F., Demir, M. (2017). An evaluation of the quality of corporate social responsibility reports by some of the worlds largest financial institutions.Journal of Business Ethics,140(4), 787-805. Situ, H., Tilt, C., Seet, P. S. (2015, November). Corporate Environmental Reporting (CER) in China: A Stakeholder Perspective. InA-CSEAR 2015-Proceedings of the 14th Australasian Centre on Social and Environmental Accounting Research Conference: A-CSEAR 2015(p. 165). Academic Conferences and publishing limited. Tsai, Y. H., Joe, S. W., Lin, C. P., Chiu, C. K., Shen, K. T. (2015). Exploring corporate citizenship and purchase intention: mediating effects of brand trust and corporate identification.Business ethics: A European review,24(4), 361-377. Wickert, C., Scherer, A. G., Spence, L. J. (2016). Walking and talking corporate social responsibility: Implications of firm size and organizational cost.Journal of Management Studies,53(7), 1169-1196